Hal Mark asked:


The scenario.. Lets say you are rich and get sentenced to 100 years in jail with no possibility of parole.
With that in mind.

A.) You die of natural causes after 30 years.
1.)Is there any law that would restrict you from putting your body into a cryogenic state in hopes that you would be able to get revived in the future?
2.) If you could, and implausibly were brought back to life, would you have to go back to jail?

B.) What if you were in jail and the sentence you received was the death sentence?
1.) would the law then preclude your from Cryogenics?
2.) If you were brought back to life would you have to go back to jail? Would you be killed again? or would your sentence be fulfilled seeing as the state did kill you?
C.) Would your time being frozen count as time served?

If you got a 60 year term, and being revived after cryogenics was perfected, and the gov said you couldn’t do it, wouldn’t that be like them giving you a term of ‘forever?’
Well, if you do cryogenics.. you would be dead.
So.. the question is..
Would the state let you do it? and what would be the results if you were brought back to life.

For arguments sake you can say in the death penalty example that you died from firing squad and one way or another they revived you by either growing you new organs or replacing the damaged organs at the time they brought you out of the cryogenic state.

Pioneer Plasma TV

TAHOE REALTOR asked:


First of all, let me say this…I believe in freedom of choice, I also believe the destruction to fetus matter is akin to killing human life. Anyone who is opinionated to one extreme or the other has missed the bottom line. CONCERN FOR OTHERS, “Do unto others as you would have them do”, the golden rule. The feelings that a young mother may have being left to fend for herself with a young child or a rape victim that was impregnated. On the other hand an wanted lifeform, who has no voice is being destroyed for the inconveniance of their being. So instead of arguing about it, lets look at it from an objective point of view and create a solution using problem solving skills. My Question is how about this? Instead of an abortion procedure using a similar procedure to extract the fetus at a early period of gestation and then incubating the fetus for the term in a proper parent or facility. Also, the possible storage using cryogenics until adoptive parent arrive. More details soon…
The cost of the procedure will be free to the patient choosing the procedure. The cost incurred from the extraction procedure, storage, labor and incubation procedure will be passed to the client of those parents, who desperately want children, but can’t have them for one reason or another. There will be basic screening process to provide certain standards for prospective parents of wanted children ,who are no longer unwanted. This process will insure the best of homes for these children with little regard for minor details, but much to do with the love for a child. Everyone wins! win-win situation for all parties involved…please feel free to ask questions regarding this preferably using critical reasoning for the progress of this effort of coming to a rational conclusion about this issue.

Stop Foreclosure